More often than not, President Muhammadu Buhari has appeared – to citizens, commentators, and even his supporters – as too silent on burning national issues. The perception is not misplaced, going by his relative lack of reaction to multifarious incidents, including rabid insecurity plaguing the country, charges of ethnic cleansing and domination, as well as the not too long ago #EndSARS protest.
And even after the Lagos EndSARS panel confirmed that
there was a massacre at the Lekki Tollgate, President Buhari kept mum about the
panel's findings. No one got fired by the president, neither did anyone resign.
The president has tended to keep mute and relatively aloof of the occurrences,
until very late, when too much damage has occurred. When President Muhammadu
Buhari was elected in 2015, he promised to protect citizens from terrorists and
criminals. But there are less than two years left of his final term in office
and the country is more unstable than it's been in decades.
By every indication,
Nigeria's lucrative kidnapping industry is thriving - expanding into previously
safe areas such as the Nigerian Army Barracks, the F.C.T, Kwara state, Ondo
state, amongst others - and seemingly beyond the control of the country's army.
It poses a real threat to trade and education, as well as the country's farming
communities
Being the head of a representative democracy that requires regular
engagement with the electorate, the leader is reasonably expected to talk to,
talk with, and generally keep in touch with the people through the many channels
available in this 21st century. Rather than engage the citizenry like his
counterparts in other parts of the world, through the many social media handles
available, president Buhari rather opted to place a ban on twitter, the same app
that helped to propagate his presidential ambition prior to coming into power.
In these times, Buhari’s silence is not at all golden.
Indeed, regular and clear
communication between a leader and the led is a sine qua non for both effective
administration and successful leadership. For if, as a leadership-training
expert John Maxwell says, leadership is influence, the potent means of a leader
to influence people is effective communication. It is the oil in the machinery
to influence. Whereas there are two sides to the meaning of silence, a leader
who aims to achieve great things for his people through them must communicate
with them; he cannot, should not, remain silent too often, too long.
The silence
of a ruler gives room in the polity for rumours, speculations and possibly
undesirable repercussion. And these happen quickly in the technologically-wired
global village that the world has become.
Granted that there is a time, a
season, and a place for everything; there is indeed a time to speak up and speak
out; there is too, a time to remain silent. In the latter case, silence is, in
popular parlance, said to be golden. Silence can be a form of thoughtful
restraint from speaking for the reason that it is at that time, a better or
wiser cause of action. Golden silence is an act of wisdom. On the one hand, the
silence of a man, and even more potently, of a leader can be a strategic weapon.
Wisely applied, it keeps the other side guessing and even confused, to the
calculated advantage of the silent. On the other hand, the silence of a leader
can indicate contempt or disdain for the led; an I -can’t- be- bothered -what
-they – think –say- or do attitude. This wooden silence is certainly not wisdom,
for a ruler, or anyone else. Indeed, as an implicitly provocative act, it is
also a risky strategy.
Persistent, protracted silence of a leader tends to show
him as clueless, as one who is overwhelmed by the job and who simply knows not
what to think, say or do about the demands of his office. As his government
muddles, wobbles, and fumbles, so will the fortune and fate of the people and of
their country. This can be tragic not only for himself, but for the country he
heads. Hydra-headed criminality has virtually taken over this country. In recent
times, there is not a day that precious human blood is not shed somewhere on the
soil of Nigeria. North and south, east and west, citizens are kidnapped, raped,
murdered; homes are burnt and farms are destroyed. With a regularity that is
somewhat nauseating, Nigerian leaders elected to assure the security and welfare
of the people content themselves with expressing their regret, commiserate with
the victims, and promise firm action against the criminals. "I have charged all
security forces to bring these criminal elements to book," they often say. And
then fall asleep, so to speak, in the comfort of their official homes and
offices maintained at public expense. But that is when they speak up at all.
Banditry is lately, the buzzword for large groups of murderous herdsmen on the
rampage with the confidence of who can stop us. They are well armed with AK-47
guns, grenade launchers, and vehicle-mounted guns and well supplied with
ammunition. This is happening in a country where all arms are supposed to be
licensed by the Police; where indeed, the authorities had long ago ordered that
such arms be surrendered. If leadership is a trust, if the primary purpose of
government is to guarantee the security and welfare of the governed, if the very
first virtuous purpose of leadership is service, then the failure of Nigerian
leaders in these respects is too palpable.
The evidence is all over: from the
debt- burdened, under-productive economy, through the chicanery of unrepentantly
parasitic politicians, to the dysfunctional state of the Nigerian society. Only
those who still benefit from the current sorry situation (and there is quite a
number spanning the various elite groups) will have the nerve to assert that all
is well with the country. Suffice it to say that Nigeria is not on course to the
greatness it deserves. And the blame falls on its leadership. At the highest
level of constituted authority, the silence to the dangerous drift of Nigeria
into anarchy is deafening, notwithstanding the sporadic statements of media
aides speaking for the Presidency.
Presidential spokespersons do have a role to
play in the polity, but Nigerians did not elect media aides as political
leaders. No. The electorate invested Mr. Muhammadu Buhari with full authority
and powers to manage the country’s affairs in the best interest of all. They
expect periodic report to the people on how well he is getting on with the job.
No spokesperson can articulate this better than the man on the job. And, the
means to do this include formal media chat, response to the pressmen questions
at occasions, televised address on issues of national urgency such as herdsmen
banditry, the state of the economy, and the roaring call for a truly federal
system of government. The alignment – or mismatch between the verbal and
nonverbal communications can speak volumes about the integrity of a leader.
Nigerians are not necessarily looking out for oratory eloquence; but they care
for substance of what their president says.
A leader who has nothing to hide
about his performance will confidently defend his actions and omissions.
Nigerians know that Mr Buhari is human, not a saint. Elected into the presidency
after three rejections, he is expected to speak to Nigerians with the conviction
of a leader doing his honest-to-God best to serve the greatest good of the
greatest number.
Wooden silence has no room in genuine leadership. Middlemen as
spokespersons and script technicians will also not replace the direct
communication between the president and the citizenry. A leader that does not
communicate limits his leadership potential while one that communicates
maximizes his leadership. At a time that tries the soul of Nigerians, silence is
not a virtue in governance. If President Buhari desires to influence Nigerians
in a meaningful, result-oriented way, he must communicate much more with them.
There are no two ways about it. Mr President must indeed speak up.
#HealingLagos#2023ElectionforYouthpic.twitter.com/ONAGMoRZFu
— tobygold.sol コープ 🦅 (@_tobygold) October 24, 2020
That's a nice piece. Very timely and thought provoking...
ReplyDeleteThank you for your feedback
DeleteNice write up. Your argument surely shows that our president does not care about us as citizens. I believe all government officials cares only about themselves and their political positions.
ReplyDeleteUnfortunately, that's the sad reality of our society.
DeleteGreat piece bro... There is no lie here...
ReplyDeleteWell, the President has always been the snail leader but probably Baba is thinking of the best way of approach to the issue. Nigeria will be well ooo
ReplyDeleteMr Governor, you don't need anybody to tell you this again, the interest of masses is not in the mind of our leaders in this Country ,selfish interest.
ReplyDeleteThe owner of a farm do not stand aloof while fire is ravaging his farm. The President should stop acting like a doll.
ReplyDeleteMr President is just a figure there, those rulling us are faceless. Nigerians have learnt to endure all forms of sufferings.
ReplyDelete